Hillary, Bibi, Petraeus, & Ferguson: Same Shit, Different Day


“It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”
—Jiddu Krishnamurti

You know, I realized the other day that it’s impossible to have a blog focused on progressive political analysis because to spend time thinking critically about modern-day politics is to drive oneself down the path of madness. In plain English, there’s simply too much bullshit going on every day to keep up. And because I can’t write something about every major event happening in the world—although I’d love to if I had the time—I decided to write a bird’s-eye take on what’s been happening this week in America. Because if this week has taught me anything, it’s that Thucydides was spot-on in what he wrote over two millennia ago: “[T]he strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.”

Take this week’s revelation that presumed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton “exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state,” very likely a violation of federal law. The story may have generated anger amongst conservatives and it further strengthens the argument that Hillary is a secrecy-obsessed politician who has little respect for transparency, but let me ask you this: do you really think Hillary will be held accountable for any legal ramifications or that her candidacy is now derailed? Of course not! It doesn’t even matter, in the final analysis, whether Hillary’s use of personal email for government business violated any laws, because the reality is that there’s a snowball’s chance in hell she will face any serious repercussions over her flagrant disregard for transparency and accountability. She was simply doing, as Thucydides would have recognized, what she could—law, transparency, and accountability be damned.


Then there was the much-hyped speech by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu to a joint session of Congress, in which he claimed the proposed US-Iran deal would “all but guarantee that Iran gets [nuclear] weapons, lots of them” and that “Iran not only defies [nuclear] inspectors, it also plays a pretty good game of hide-and-cheat with them.” Jesus—the chutzpah on that guy. First of all, there is only one country in the Middle East that has “lots of” nuclear weapons: Israel. According to a report in Haaretz, in fact, Israel has approximately 80 nuclear weapons (compared with Iran’s count of zero). Second, Bibi’s argument that Iran “defies” nuclear inspectors is funnier than anything penned by Oscar Wilde. Again, there is only one country in the Middle East that has straight-up refused (talk about defiance!) to have any inspector visit their nuclear weapons program facilities. And that country—shocker, I know—is Israel. Again, Thucydides was right. Israel is a strong state (rich, supported by the US, heavily-armed, etc.) and so they do more-or-less whatever they want (build nukes, destroy homes, fence-in the Palestinian population, reject inspectors wholeheartedly) without ramification. By contrast, Iran is a relatively weak state (poorer, more isolated, sanctioned, etc.) and therefore they must suffer the hypocrisy of speeches like the one Bibi gave this week.


Then there’s the Gen. Petraeus news, which is that he received a cushy (to say the least) plea deal in which he will avoid jail time entirely after he shared classified information with his biographer and lover. Contrast that treatment, of course, with the treatment of other leakers of classified information: Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, etc. I don’t need to review here how harshly the US government has prosecuted and/or treated those individuals because that (should be) common knowledge by now, but suffice it to say that again Thucydides was right. Petraeus, an Army General and former CIA Director with obvious (and manifold) ties to power, gets away virtually scot-free with leaking state secrets. By contrast, Manning, Snowden, and Assange were all rebels acting against the fountains of power and operating from relatively weak positions, and hence were pursued with incredible vigor by the American government.

And then there’s news from Ferguson, Missouri, in that the Department of Justice found that Ferguson’s police department routinely violated the rights of African-Americans. They also cleared Officer Darren Wilson of any federal civil rights charges. Which brings me back to something I wrote about several months ago: where did the #BlackLivesMatter protests get us? To borrow a line from Sarah Palin, those protests were a bridge to nowhere. I’m sorry—ain’t a damn thing change since Mike Brown was gunned down, since Eric Garner was choked out, or since Tamir Rice’s lifeless body fell on the grass after being shot by police. So to be honest with you, I don’t really care that the DOJ found gross civil rights violations on the part of the Ferguson PD—what’s that gonna change? Who will be held accountable? Short answer: nothing and no one. Once again, Thucydides was prescient. The military-industrial complex is too strong, entrenched interests (the private-prison lobby, arms manufactures, etc.) are too powerful, and working-class Americans too weak to do anything about it. As my headline says: same shit, different day.


But I’m getting tired of this endless merry-go-round, folks. I’m getting tired of DOJ investigation after NYT report after presidential pronouncement after Congressional committee after public protest when I know those things won’t bring us change. And I know that for the simple reason that we’ve already tried those things one-hundred times over, and yet change and justice remain dreams deferred. As has been observed a million times before, isn’t it insane to do the same thing again and again but expect a different result each time? I’d rather take inspiration from Claude McKay’s poem “If We Must Die,” in which he observes “If we must die, let it not be like hogs/ Hunted and penned in an inglorious spot” but rather let’s “face the murderous, cowardly pack, / Pressed to the wall, dying, but fighting back!”

Explore the Archives. Like my Facebook page. Follow me on Twitter.

What a Dress can Teach us About What’s Wrong with the World


In case you missed it—and hopefully you did miss it, as I pray you have better things to do—an image of a dress posted online yesterday “[set] off a social-media conflagration that few were able to resist,” according to The New York Times. (That the NYT published an article about the dress makes you wonder about their tagline “All the News That’s Fit to Print,” as surely there are other things happening in the world that are more relevant to the public interest than the color of a dress). Obviously, I do not care about the dress-color issue and am not going to wade into those waters. What I do want to talk about, however, is how this episode demonstrates precisely what is wrong the world today.

You see, with so many issues going on in the world today—war in Ukraine, the ongoing drone war in AfPak & Yemen, widespread NSA surveillance, rampant socio-economic inequality, a straggling economy, etc.—a dress is what captures our collective attention. As the NYT reports, BuzzFeed’s poll as to the color of the dress has been viewed 28 million times already. And I’m sitting here thinking: why can’t we get 28 million people to care about any of the issues I mentioned above? Surely socio-economic inequality and the relentless cycle of work-bills-debt affect more people than that? No? The whole episode reminds me of that quote from Orwell’s 1984 that I wrote about yesterday: “Why was it that they could never shout like that about anything that mattered?” Unfortunately, I already know the answer to that: people just don’t care about NSA surveillance, an endless drone war, etc. They care about dresses: blue ones, black ones, gold ones, white ones.


And you know: I just don’t get it anymore. Working-class Americans are working harder and earning less day after day. Wall Street banks are richer and larger today than they were before they nearly wrecked the global economy. The Global War on Terror seems to have no end in sight. And yet here we are, going cuckoo over some irrelevant dress that will be totally forgotten 48 hours from now (if not before that). With priorities like that, I wonder whether we’re starting to make the Dark Ages look enlightened by comparison. The whole episode about this dress, in fact, reminds me of graffiti artist Banksy’s recent work in Gaza. One of Banksy’s newest pieces is a spray-painted image of a cat against an anonymous blown-out wall in Gaza, the sole remainder of what was presumably once a house or building. As Banksy explained regarding the piece, he drew a picture of a kitten on the destroyed building in the hopes of drawing attention to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, because he’s learned (as have I) that people don’t care about the situation there—they care about cute cats instead. I’m starting to think his work would’ve fared better had he painted an image of a white-and-gold dress against the destroyed building instead. Maybe then people would start to care about things that matter.

—Winston A.

Explore the Archives. Like my Facebook page. Follow me on Twitter.

What Orwell’s 1984 Taught me About America

cropped-copz.jpg“The actual writing would be easy. All he had to do was to transfer to paper the interminable restless monologue that had been running inside his head, literally for years.”
—George Orwell, 1984, on Winston’s decision to start a Diary

One of the major downsides to our digital age—in which communication increasingly happens vis-à-vis emoji, email, 140 characters, text messages, status updates, and the like—is that few people read books anymore. I mean, my generation is the one that birthed the concept of TL;DR for Christ’s sake. (That’s short for “Too Long, Didn’t Read,” which I’ve seen used in ways that suggest it is now cool to flaunt one’s inability to read and process too many words at once). That contrasts starkly with what I know about Ancient Rome and Greece, where one’s ability to recite huge quantities of information from memory (think Cicero) was seen as an art and something to be in awe of. And the only way you could memorize a text, of course, was to read it repeatedly. Fast-forward to the present, however, and the Pew Research Center reports that “[a]s of January 2014, some 76% of American adults ages 18 and older said that they read at least one book in the past year.” Put another way: nearly one-quarter of Americans do not read any books per year. Zero, zip, nada.

All of which is a relatively roundabout way of getting to my point: few people have actually read George Orwell’s 1984 front-to-back. (If you haven’t read it, do so now). I know this because anyone who has read the book in the past decade or so would notice many startling similarities between Winston’s fictional world and the present, which (presumably) would be both startling and disturbing to the modern reader. After all, Orwell’s book was supposed to be a critique of the evil Soviet Union—right? While that may have been true when he wrote it, that doesn’t mean it’s impossible (or wrong) to find connections between 1984’s Oceania and 2015’s America. And so, without further ado, let’s read through some quotes I’ve pulled directly from the novel and you can judge for yourself whether—and to what degree—they apply to your country today. (For Generation TL;DR, note that the quotes below provide an accurate synopsis of the themes discussed in the novel, so it’s kinda like you read the whole thing!).


“There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time.”

I’m trying to figure out how people can distinguish between the quote above and the modern era of rampant NSA/GCHQ surveillance, but I just can’t do it. Do you have any way of knowing whether your emails, calls, and social media use are being monitored? No—you don’t.

“Parsons was Winston’s fellow employee at the Ministry of Truth. He was a fattish but active man of paralyzing stupidity, a mass of imbecile enthusiasms—one of those completely unquestioning devoted drudges on whom, more even than the Thought Police, the stability of the Party depended.”

Similarly, the status quo today depends on most of us being “completely unquestioning devoted drudges.” The government tells us Russia is interfering with Ukraine, we believe it no questions asked. The government tells us NSA surveillance programs help stop terrorists, we believe it no questions asked. The government tells us Greece needs to accept austerity, we believe it no questions asked. The list goes on ad infinitum, and the stability of the system—in other words, the maintenance of the status quo—depends on us not questioning the official storyline.

“Winston could not definitely remember a time when his country had not been at war…”

I can’t. Can you?

“Why was it that they could never shout like that about anything that mattered? Until they have become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.” (emphasis in original)

That’s how I feel every time I see people shout and rally about relative trivialities—their favorite sports team, another St. Patrick’s day parade, another EDM concert, etc.—and then I notice those same people almost never shout about NSA surveillance, a drone war gone out-of-control, the affront to the rule-of-law that is Guantanamo Bay, etc.

“Perhaps a lunatic was simply a minority of one.”

I know the feeling 🙂

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

This is like when the government tells us “Yes, we are in an economic recovery” or “the economy is gaining strength now” when everyone who works for a living knows that isn’t true.

“To understand the nature of the present war—for in spite of the regrouping which occurs every few years, it is always the same war—one must realize in the first place that it is impossible for it to be decisive.”

Even though Obama tells us his plan is to “degrade and ultimately destroy” ISIS (whatever that means), he knows—and we should know too—that this is gobbledygook. You don’t really think the Global War on Terror (even though Obama no longer uses that term) is going to end anytime soon, do you?

“For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once  they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and  they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance.”

I submit that quotation without comment.

“The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival.”

Regarding the second part of that quote, ask yourself how many times in recent years the government has expanded its power (drones, NSA surveillance, etc.) and has justified doing so under the theory their actions keep us safe in a time of danger.

“Even the official ally of the moment is always regarded with the darkest suspicions.”

Remember when the NSA spied on Angela Merkel and Germany? Remember when the NSA spied on the United Nations? Remember when the NSA spied on the European Union? Remember when the NSA spied on the Copenhagen climate change summit? Anyone remember any of that?

“Whatever the Party holds to be truth is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party. That is the fact that you have got to relearn, Winston.”

Well, I guess I’m still working on that last part.

—Winston A.

Explore the Archives. Like my Facebook page. Follow me on Twitter.

Why Citizenfour is a Joke—On Us


As you may have heard, Laura Poitras’ film Citizenfour—about Edward Snowden and the NSA surveillance disclosures—won the Academy Award for best documentary a few days ago. I don’t have the time or patience to delve into an analysis of the film (for starters, I haven’t even seen it), but I do want to take a little time to explain why the film is a joke. And the joke, my friends, is on us.

You see, even though Citizenfour won an Academy Award—in a televised event viewed by millions—it will do absolutely nothing to bring reform to the surveillance state. (Which, let’s not forget, is the whole reason Snowden did what he did). As I wrote last December, we haven’t gotten anywhere in terms of reining in an out-of-control surveillance state, and there’s absolutely nothing to suggest that real reform is anywhere on the horizon. That explains why I was dumbfounded to read Amy Davidson’s take on the film in The New Yorker, which she closed by noting “outside the [Hong Kong] hotel room, things really did change.” What? What parallel universe is she living in? What, I ask you, has changed post-Snowden? My answer: nothing. NSA surveillance is as widespread and pervasive as ever. Nobody got fired or held accountable for anything. Yes, we’ve “raised awareness” about surveillance, but absolutely nothing has been done about it. So what’s there to celebrate, folks?


According to the for-profit media, however, there’s apparently a lot to celebrate. In the Washington Post, Alyssa Rosenberg notes that a scene in the film “say[s] more about what we lose when we’re stripped of our privacy than even the most explosive document ever could.” Except, again—I don’t need to see the film to know what it’s like to be stripped of my privacy rights. All I need to do is go online and do anything at all, and I already know my privacy rights are being infringed upon (I know this, of course, because state surveillance has not been curtailed whatsoever post-Snowden). And yet Conor Friedersdorf, writing in The Atlantic, absurdly suggests that the Academy-Award win for Citizenfour “couldn’t have pleased the NSA and its apologists.” I mean: who is he kidding? The NSA and their apologists could care less about how many people watch Citizenfour or how many awards the film wins—they know that significant surveillance reform is as likely as a blizzard in the Sahara.

And that’s really all I have to say on the matter. There’s really no point into looking into this film any further, because honestly anyone who cares to know anything about global state surveillance can do so without ever watching this film. And I’m tired of people saying that films like this “raise awareness” about an issue. No, they don’t. The state surveillance disclosures first made headlines back in June of 2013—so if you aren’t aware of what the NSA and GCHQ are up to by now, you likely never will be. Bottom line: just like what went wrong with the BlackLivesMatter protests, we don’t need awareness anymore—we need action. For once.

—Winston A.

Follow me on Twitter. Like my Facebook page.

Nature or Nurture: Hiking as the Antidote to our Digital Age

10373969_893525939733_8033547778225173248_n(All photographs taken by me)
This is approaching the summit of Alta Peak in Sequoia National Park

Prior to moving to the Bay Area, I barely spent any time in the wilderness—couldn’t, in fact, finish a mild five-mile trail in New England without being beset by the twin devils of exhaustion and boredom. Fast-forward through several years in the Golden State, however, and I’ve conquered big peaks and strenuous trails everywhere from Yosemite to Kings Canyon to Joshua Tree to Death Valley to Humboldt Redwoods to Tahoe to Big Sur. Over that period one might say I’ve lived my own chapter of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, going from career-focused graduate student to trail-blazing mountain goat. And you know what? I couldn’t be happier to have shifted my focus from the world of corporations and cubicles to the one of birds and bees.

1009829_790202645443_1597178747_n(Returning from Half Dome in Yosemite).

Because if I’ve learned anything during my many hikes, it’s that spending time in the wilderness is more important now than ever before. And the reason for that is simple, my friends: we have never been so disconnected from the natural world. Absorbed in our screens, smartphones, and social media accounts, we’ve grown to comprehend pixels more readily than pastures. New research indicates the average American spends 12 hours per day in front of a screen. (Back in 2009, The New York Times reported the average was 8.5 hours). And this infographic from the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates that the average American slept 7.7 hours per day in 2013, leaving us just over four hours per day for everything that doesn’t involve screens or snoring. That’s barely enough time to arrive at one of America’s many national parks, let alone to explore them on foot from base to summit. So the numbers shouldn’t surprise us: the average audience for this year’s Super Bowl was 114 million people; Call of Duty has roughly 40-million monthly active users; the Mall of America has 40 million visitors annually. By contrast, one of America’s oldest and most spectacular national parks—Yosemite—attracts a paltry 3-4 million visitors a year. (For perspective, California’s population hovers somewhere around 40 million).

10496087_902775867803_6639144807568092366_o(En route to the Mt. Whitney summit).

But the facts and figures can never accurately encapsulate what we’ve lost along the way to our technicolor “progress” of iWatches, FitBits, Wikis, and Teslas. I’ve learned—one might say the hard way, but I’d say the fun way—that only through hiking and spending time in the wilderness can we begin to replace what we’ve been missing. As David Abram put it in The Spell of the Sensuous, “Today we participate almost exclusively with other humans and with our own human-made technologies. It is a precarious situation, given our age-old reciprocity with the many-voiced landscape” (emphasis mine). Simply put: we’ve lost touch with that many-voiced landscape that our ancestors knew so well. The ancient Greeks did not have (or need) the Internet to provide them with “access to information”—they were able to learn so much simply by opening their eyes and looking around. Ditto the Iroquois, the Cherokees, and the Mayans. We no longer recognize the many-voiced landscape that speaks through birds and bears, creeks and canyons, mountains and molehills, stars and streams. We recognize, instead, the theme song to Law & Order.

1238166_804094710633_1467634974_n (Somewhere deep in Joshua Tree National Park).

Standing in civilization’s echo chamber of self-congratulation, man places himself simultaneously at the center and the top of everything. We believe we are the smartest animal, the most accomplished, and the most capable. We behave as if the world revolves us and our desires alone. The modern ethos seems to be: “What can I learn from flora and fauna that I can’t without technology?” Or as Lewis Lapham once wrote: “Out of sight and out of mind, the chicken, the pig, and the cow [have] lost their licenses to teach.” But as I’ve written about in other posts (see here and here), even a short hike in the wilderness can yield insights that are simply unattainable through technology. We could learn—as any animal can teach—to live in harmony with our planet and its resources. We could learn—as any tree could teach—that what seems boring, dull, or lifeless on the surface is in fact anything but. We could learn—as any river or canyon could teach—that water (not technology) shapes our world. And so forth.

1966918_864448975203_6911329317604018042_n(Point Reyes National Seashore).

And if my hiking has taught me anything else, it’s that these lessons aren’t being learned by enough of us. Instead, we’re learning how to type words and emojis into an ever-wider array of devices. We’re learning how to use social media better. We’re learning to buy a new device this year and toss it out the next when the latest version becomes available. We’re learning how to save our countless photographs to The Cloud, where we will likely never look at them again. We’re learning how to code for the digital economy.

What we forgot, however, is that we’re not the only ones here on Earth. Not by a long shot. There’s a whole world out there for whom the terms Iraq, Bill O’Reilly, unemployment, Goldman Sachs, bipartisanship, etc. mean nothing. There are billions of living things that get around each and every day without Google Maps. There are a near-infinite number of examples of ingenuity, intelligence, empathy, and emotion in the natural world. We need to listen to those voices from nature now more than ever, lest the effects of climate change drown them out while we are too busy discussing who wore what to the Oscars last night.

10917807_975412737933_7115878980658990598_o(On the Yosemite Falls trail in Yosemite Nat’l Park).

And even though we can learn much from the words of nature, don’t get me wrong—the words of man still have much to teach as well. So I’ll leave the last word to Henry Beston, who said it best in his novel The Outermost House:

“We need another and a wiser and perhaps a more mystical concept of animals. Remote from universal nature, and living by complicated artifice, man in civilization surveys the creature through the glass of his knowledge and sees thereby a feather magnified and the whole image in distortion. We patronize them for their incompleteness, for their tragic fate of having taken form so far below ourselves. And therein we err, and greatly err. For the animal shall not be measured by man. In a world older and more complete than ours they move finished and complete, gifted with extensions of the senses we have lost or never attained, living by voices we shall never hear. They are not brethren, they are not underlings; they are other nations, caught with ourselves in the net of life and time, fellow prisoners of the splendour and travail of the earth.”

—Winston A.

Follow me on Twitter. Like my Facebook page.